Wednesday Night Grab Bag

Written by Nichols on .

Here's your Wednesday night edition of what's kicking around the Interwebs. Enjoy.

For those of you who were hoping that the 2012 NHL All-Star Game announcement would be a precursor to the Senators getting a new scoreboard, this news is going to hit you like a bucket of cold water. Via Twitter, Bruce Garrioch (@SunGarrioch) has let it be knownst that Senators owner Eugene Melnyk indicated there won't be a new scoreboard at Scotiabank Place for the 2012 NHL all star game. Isn't it fitting that the organization spends more time and resources modernizing their jersey than they do on their scoreboard? Don't get me wrong. I can understand why. But at some point, will the organization stop preying upon those devout fans who exhibit a tendency to drop significant coin on any jersey that's new. At this point, I wish the team would follow Buffalo Sabres model by recognizing the errs of their ways and reintroduce the original uniforms.

Out of the rumo(u)r pages, Eklund is mentioning on Hockeybuzz that the Senators have held discussions with the Los Angeles Kings and that Spezza's name is at the forefront of many of the rumours. Personally, I believe that the Spezza rumours are without base. If he truly was on the way out of town, I doubt that he would have taken the time to attend today's Senators function at the Chateau Laurier. Albeit, it is often that I find that with Eklund and other rumo(u)r mongerers is that when they discuss some information, they may not have the names of the players right but they sometimes tend to have the correct teams named. Interestingly, Bryan Murray was conspicuously absent from today's events. Maybe he was working the phones? Regardless, I feel that if Ottawa was to make a move, it would be to trade some of their depth for a better individual talent.

As I noted earlier, the Senators revealed their official 50-man training camp roster today. While the Ottawa Sun also revealed the Senators camp roster, at quick glance it looked as though they neglected to mention Brian Lee. Fear not though Lee fans, he was included in the Sun article. However, his name simply wasn't given the same formatting as some of his peers, thereby making it look like he wasn't invited to camp.

Over at Off the Posts, Don Brennan rightfully asserts that although the All-Star Game confirmation is great news for the local economy, the game itself is fluff. In the piece, Don notes that the game itself is an insult to Canadian hockey fans who like more about the game than fancy stickhandling and nice passing. Or in other words, he doesn't like the game because it showcases the same skills that he demands from Alexei Kovalev on a nightly basis.

TSN is running a featured article on where Jared Cowen future lies for the 2010-11 season. In it, there are two interesting comments from Kurt Kleinendorst and Jon Klemm. First, here's Kleinendorst, "I think when you watch us play and you watch our blue-line, he is the one guy that just kind of jumps out at you. He's probably the closest to being ready (for the NHL), but is he ready? He's a young kid."

And here's Klemm, an assistant coach for the Spokane Chiefs who truly believes that Cowen won't be returned to the junior club, "He's a big, physical presence out there. He can change the game at any time with a big hit or a great defensive play. That's kind of the player he is. He handles himself very well not only on the ice but off the ice -- he's great in the locker-room, he works extremely hard. It was a pleasure to work with him last year."

When asked how he'd feel about playing another year of junior, Cowen responded with this,

"This is where I think I can improve the most," he said. "If I went back to junior, it would be a step back. If I stayed here, I'd obviously get a lot better and become a better player. Going back to junior, it would be a familiar spot -- Spokane's a nice place to play, I love the guys on the team, love the coaching staff and everything.

But this is a step forward. This is where I want to start."

 

In the past month, we've seen a number of mainstream media types weigh in on the battle between bloggers and journalists. Bruce Dowbiggin, of the Globe & Mail, is the latest to chime in on the issue. According to Dowbiggin, if NHL teams are going to begin the process of credentialing bloggers, it isn't enough of a deterrent to simply threaten bloggers with a loss of credentials or libel lawsuits, in fact, he recommends that bloggers post a $10,000 bond before being allowed in a pressbox. I shit you not. Anyways, without getting into the debate, the folks over at the Toronto Maple Leafs blog aptly named Pension Plan Puppets weigh in and it's a worthwhile read. So check it out.

Odds are, if you're a fan of the Ottawa Senators, you have an innate hatred for Darcy Tucker. Hell, even if you don't, this brilliant and original piece by SLC of Five For Smiting deserves to be read. What are you waiting for?! Read it now!

According to the Ottawa Citizen, Nick Foligno believes that he has the opportunity to grow and grab one of top six spots on one of Ottawa's first two lines. It's a bold statement and in fairness to Nick, I don't know how he's going to do it. If Peter Regin assumes the left-wing slot that he played alongside Jason Spezza during last spring's playoffs and Milan Michalek fills the second line left-wing spot, where does Nick Foligno fit in? Especially when you consider that the Ruutu - Kelly - Neil line will remain intact. Nick's not a fourth-line player, but with Ottawa's depth, where else does he fit?

Training Camp Roster Revealed

Written by Nichols on .

sens12

The Ottawa Senators revealed their 50-man training camp roster today. Camp opens on Friday, September 17th with all of the players taking their physicals that morning.

Here is the roster:

Five goaltenders, 2009-10 team(s): Brian Elliott (Ottawa - NHL), Mike Brodeur (Binghamton - AHL, Ottawa - NHL), Pascal Leclaire (Ottawa - NHL), Barry Brust (Florida - ECHL, Houston - AHL), Robin Lehner (Sault Ste. Marie - OHL, Binghamton - AHL)

15 defencemen, 2009-10 team(s): Jared Cowen (Spokane - WHL, Ottawa - NHL), Chris Phillips (Ottawa - NHL), Brian Lee (Binghamton - AHL, Ottawa - NHL), Chris Campoli (Ottawa - NHL), Filip Kuba (Ottawa - NHL), David Hale (Tampa Bay - NHL, Norfolk - AHL), Matt Carkner (Ottawa - NHL), Patrick Wiercioch (Denver - WCHA), Andre Benoit (Hamilton - AHL), Derek Smith (Binghamton - AHL, Ottawa - NHL), Sergei Gonchar (Pittsburgh - NHL), Geoff Kinrade (Binghamton - AHL), Eric Gryba (Boston U. - HE, Binghamton - AHL), Craig Schira (Binghamton - AHL), Erik Karlsson (Binghamton - AHL, Ottawa - NHL)

30 forwards, 2009-10 team(s): Milan Michalek (Ottawa - NHL), Daniel Alfredsson (Ottawa - NHL), Mike Fisher (Ottawa - NHL), Peter Regin (Ottawa - NHL), Zack Smith (Binghamton - AHL, Ottawa - NHL), Bobby Butler (New Hampshire - HE, Ottawa - NHL), Jesse Winchester (Ottawa - NHL), Jason Spezza (Ottawa - NHL), Chris Kelly (Ottawa - NHL), Kaspars Daugavins (Binghamton - AHL, Mississauga - OHL), Chris Neil (Ottawa - NHL), Ryan Shannon (Ottawa - NHL), Alex Kovalev (Ottawa - NHL), Corey Locke (Hartford - AHL, NY Rangers - AHL), Erik Condra (Binghamton - AHL), Jason Bailey (Binghamton - AHL), Jim O’Brien (Binghamton - AHL, Ottawa - NHL), Roman Wick (Kloten - Switzerland), Ryan Keller (Binghamton - AHL, Ottawa - NHL), Francis Lessard (San Antonio - AHL), Jakub Culek (Rimouski - QMJHL), Colin Greening (Cornell - ECAC), Corey Cowick (Ottawa - OHL), Tim Spencer (Binghamton - AHL, Elmira - ECHL), Cody Bass (Binghamton - AHL), David Dziurzynski (Alberni Valley - BCHL), Mark Stone (Brandon - WHL), Mike Hoffman (Saint John - QMJHL), Nick Foligno (Ottawa - NHL), Jarkko Ruutu (Ottawa - NHL)

no comments

Ottawa Senators Faceoff Luncheon

Written by Nichols on .

162453546

This afternoon, I was fortunate enough to go to the Ottawa Senators Faceoff Luncheon at the Chateau Laurier. I'll try and throw together a post on it later today but for now, here's a picture of the NHL 2012 All-Star Game puck.

Ottawa Senators Roundtable Part Deux

Written by Nichols on .

Last month, a few of the various Senators website writers came together for a roundtable to discuss and get different perspectives on some of the various hot button topics involving the Ottawa Senators. Considering how well the first one went, here is the second of our monthly Senators blog roundtables featuring Tony Mendes from SenShot, Peter Raaymakers from the Silver Seven, SLC from Five for Smiting and myself. Each month, one of these aforementioned people will choose five questions for the panelists to answer and this month, it was Peter's turn.

1. Zack Smith seems to have the inside track, but which other prospects do you think have a good chance to make the NHL squad? Bobby Butler? Jared Cowen? Roman Wick? Someone else?

Tony, SenShot: I think Cody Bass will be a surprise in training camp and will start the season in Ottawa. He has been in the organization for awhile now and needs to prove he can handle the NHL. Seeing others such as Smith pass him on the depth chart, I think Bass will come into camp with a chip on his shoulder and will use his grit to earn a spot with the big club. The top six forward spots are spoken for and a third line of Ruutu-Kelly-Neil will be hard to break up. The Sens already have too many defensemen with one-way contracts, so the only spots possibly available are on the fourth line. Bass is a hard worker and great penalty killer and will use these assets to earn a spot.

Peter, Silver Seven: I think the Senators will have some prospects making strong statements in training camp, but looking at the number of players on one-way contracts, it's going to be difficult for anyone to really stick on the NHL squad. I'm pretty sure Z. Smith will continue to play as the fourth-line centre, with Jesse Winchester or Ryan Shannon as the healthy scratch, but I think we might be surprised on defence: Jared Cowen's got a decent shot. The losses of Andy Sutton and Anton Volchenkov have left a pretty big void in terms of physical, defensive defencemen. Chris Phillips and Matt Carkner are the obvious choices for penalty-killing, but where do we go after that? I don't think Cory Clouston would be too excited about both Filip Kuba, Chris Campoli, or Brian Lee killing penalties (and imagine if one of those four were in the sin bin... ), so Cowen will get every chance to make the team--including a nine-game tryout before the Sens have to decide what to do with him.

SLC, Five for Smiting: Bank it: Cowen will get a full nine game audition coming out of camp, especially if he brings the pain at the rookie tourney.  Murray has shown he's not afraid to burn a year on an ELC if he thinks it will help the club (see file: Karlsson, E.) and Lord knows our StayPuft D will need all the bang it can get.  In a perfect world, Cowen wins a spot outright, meaning The Bryan will be free to dump...er... "trade" the now entirely redundant Filip Kuba.  This would make my pants very happy.

Graeme, The 6th Sens: Poor Brian Lee. From being passed on the depth chart, to losing his number fifty-five, to his exclusion from prospect discussion by the Senators blogosphere. Of all the names listed, I think they all stand a reasonable chance to play on the big club this upcoming season. Whether they all crack the roster at the end of the exhibition schedule remains to be seen. Obviously based on their experiences last season, Smith and Butler will probably get the first opportunity to play regular minutes up front. Wick will likely get recalled once he's earned a promotion and adapted to the North American style. Like SLC, I'm in agreement that Cowen will be given every opportunity to make the club. As was the case with Erik Karlsson last season, his addition to the squad would help fill a void that the team lacks. However, if Cowen shows that he's not ready. I wouldn't be shocked to see him returned to junior for another year and see the Senators move a body or two to bring in a physical defenceman who can fill that void with guys like Patrick Wiercioch or Eric Gryba filling in as injury replacements.

2. The final two games in the playoffs did a lot to restore Pascal Leclaire's standing on the Senators, but which of Leclaire and Brian Elliott do you think will begin the season as the number one goaltender?

Tony: I think Leclaire will begin the season as the starter as he is in the last year of his contract and Sens management want to know if he should be resigned. Sens brass also bought in Leclaire's old goalie coach from Columbus to help Leclaire regain his confidence. Leclaire has a larger upside then Elliott, however, he needs to prove he can stay healthy and be consistent. Leclaire's playoff performance has restored some faith in him, but he will be given a short leash as Clouston only cares about winning. I believe Leclaire will be the starter on opening night, but I am not as confident he will end the season as the undisputed number one.

Peter: In the crease, we're starting from scratch right now. Clouston's familiarity with Brian Elliott probably gives him a slight edge, but Pascal Leclaire seems to think his injury problems are behind him now (we can only hope), and he's got more pedigree as a starting goalie. In terms of pure skill, I have to give the advantage to Leclaire, but Elliott seems to have more physical and mental discipline. But right now, I don't think either of them can be classified as the starter.

SLC: Snoopy's salary guarantees he'll be the starter come October 8th.  But he will be on a VERY short leash.  It was fairly obvious last year that the Little General didn't trust him, and I don't think two decent games (one of which involved choking up a three goal lead, let us remember) six months ago will be enough to change that.  This of course assumes that Snoop even makes it to camp and doesn't get hurt tying his skates.

Graeme: Since both goalies are headed towards free agency on July 1st, I believe that both are going to be given every opportunity to take hold of the number one gig and roll with it. Based on his salary and the way that last season ended, I would fully expect Cory Clouston to anoint Leclaire as the opening day starter. Mind you, if Robin Lehner has a productive season in the AHL, all of our eyes will be looking towards the future.

3. With Sergei Gonchar, a more experienced Erik Karlsson, and (hopefully) healthy returns for Filip Kuba, Alex Kovalev, and Milan Michalek, the Senators' powerplay should be better than last year. But do you think the difference will be significant, in terms of PP efficiency and, ultimately, Ottawa's point totals in the standings?

Tony: I think Ottawa's powerplay will improve this year with the addition of Gonchar and healthier players. However, Ottawa has never really had a dominate powerplay that scared teams. I think the team this year will set the foundation for a good powerplay and maybe next season, their chemistry will be greater and lead to more success.

Peter: Ottawa's powerplay has got to be hugely more potent than it was last year, I don't think there's any question about that. And I do think that will translate into more points in the standings, especially when you consider all the one-goal losses become ties thanks to more powerplay efficiency. Improved goaltending consistency is the Senators' biggest area for improvement in the standings, but a better powerplay is a close second.

SLC: Unlike some of our esteemed coleagues *cough*Nichols*cough* I'm expecting a huge upgrade on the PP over last season, not that that would be a particularly tough trick to pull off.  With Gonch, Karlsson and yes, even Kuba (whom I'm still totally willing to give away to a good home) feeding them, the forwards should actually be able to hit the zone with some speed instead of having to constantly come back to recover another cement handed flub from Carks or A-Train (RIP).  All that remains is to convince the Zebras to actually give us a PP every now and then.  Then we're golden, kids.

Graeme: Let me start by saying, I'm not sure why SLC singled me out as  a believer that Ottawa's PP won't improve. I thought I've written a number of pieces indicating my belief that the addition of Gonchar and the maturity of Erik Karlsson can only help Alexei Kovalev and Ottawa's PP. Let's take a look at last year's numbers. In 290 PP opportunities, Ottawa scored 49 PP goals. Assuming that these defencemen can help revert just one player, like Kovalev, back to his career norms in terms of PP production the difference could be huge. Five to ten goals could have pushed Ottawa's PP into one of the ten best success ratings.

4. Although Matt Carkner, Chris Neil, Jarkko Ruutu, and even (one would assume) Zack Smith are expected to be in the Senators' lineup next year, do you guys expect tough guy Francis Lessard to play much (or at all) for Ottawa this season?

Tony: I don't think Lessard will play any games in Ottawa this year. Along with the above mentioned players, there are many guys in the line-up that play with enough grit to keep teams honest. Fisher, Michalek and Foligno can all hold their own. Lessard is a fighter and is needed more in the AHL protecting the young kids then being a liability in the NHL.

Peter: I think there may be the odd game where Lessard plays, especially if we run into injuries at some point. Looking at the bruising lineup the Maple Leafs have, and the historic rivalry, I think those are a few obvious games that Lessard could be useful--especially since Carkner stands to be a more important part of our defence (at least defensively speaking), so we can't afford to lose him for five minutes at a time too often.

SLC: Saturday, November 27th, 2010.  Game three against the Leafs, at home.  Phaneuf can bang his rocks together in a truculent fashion from the infirmary.

Graeme: No. If I've noticed one thing from the Murray/Clouston regime, it's that they favour pugilists who can contribute in other facets of the game.

5. How do you want to see the defence pairings set up for next season

Tony:

  • Gonchar - Karlsson : This will give Karlsson a mentor on the ice who he can tailor his game after. Together they may be a defensive liability, but these two can move the puck so well that they can exit their zone quickly and push the offense, thus limiting opponent's chances.
  • Phillips - Lee : This can be our new shut-down pairing. Phillips is as solid as a rock and is a great teacher. Lee needs to establish a role for himself to stick in the NHL. He can be the smooth skating defensive defensemen. It is now or never for Lee and I think this gives him his best chance to succeed.
  • Kuba - Campoli : These two have tons of offensive talent, and by being the third pairing, they will go up against other teams third and fourth lines which can open up the ice for them. These two will also be the second powerplay unit and can work on building chemistry together.
  • Carkner : Matt can be the seventh defensemen who can come in and play the physical shutdown role and/or the enforcer role. He can also fill in when injuries happen (and with three defensemen well into their thirties, injuries are bound to happen). Matt can also play on the fourth line if more toughness is needed. This is no slight to Matt, but the Sens' defense this year will be all about puck possession and pushing the offense, which is not exactly Matt's game.
  • Cowen : I think Cowen will get a nine game audition with the big club before he is sent down to junior. This will be to see what Cowen's got and to see how far along he is in his development. He probably will be paired with Phillips as a safety net.

These pairings pair our younger defensemen with veterans to help them learn the game and to protect them too.

Peter: I seem to be one of few people condoning an absolutely stacked offensive first-pairing: Sergei Gonchar with Erik Karlsson. They'd play almost the entire span of just about every powerplay, take offensive-zone faceoffs, and basically get the sweet ice time for increased offensive production. I think the second pairing would be somewhat of a shutdown pairing, although Kuba's presence with Phillips makes it a little difficult to call it that (although I think without putting undue offensive pressure on Kuba, we might enable him to simplify his game and, ultimately, play a lot better). Third will be Carkner with either Lee or Campoli, whoever's playing better at the time, unless one of Cowen or even perhaps David Hale gets a shot as a defensive force on the blue line.

SLC: Gonchar - Karlsson (the softness terrifies me)
Big Rig - Campoli
Carks - Cowen (WE HAVE BECOME DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS)
Wiercioch

Kuba + Lee will make for a lovely gift basket.  Just sayin...

Graeme: Like it or not, Chris Phillips has always been partnered with the team's best defenceman since he entered his prime. First it was Zdeno Chara, then it was Anton Volchenkov. Now, it's Sergei Gonchar's turn. Here's what I have:

Phillips-Gonchar
Kuba-Karlsson
Campoli-Carkner

Jason Spezza Avoids the Media

Written by Nichols on .

spezza_tickle

It was only a couple of weeks ago when Jason Spezza put on a magnificently rehearsed performance at his charity golf tournament. In it, he attempted to address the drama and uncertainty that stemmed from his exit meeting that he had with Bryan Murray.

“I just want to clear up a lot of the talk going on, at no point did I ever demand a trade to Bryan Murray. At the end of the year, I was pretty emotional and upset. I was upset at losing, I was upset at the response I got (booed at home), I talked to Bryan about — I see it in the newspapers every year, they talk about me, and I said, if you want to move me you can move me . . . if you think it’s best for the team.

I signed here for seven years (in 2007) because I like the city, I like the team, I like my teammates,” Spezza said. “There’s obviously going to be bumps in the road. I think it’s important to have communication between players and management, and that’s what we had. It just became a little more public, and became a little bigger deal than it should have been." ~ via Ottawa Citizen

I don't want to make a big issue of this but maybe it's time that Spezza realizes that the communication between the media and the player is almost as important in this city. If you haven't heard, after an informal skating session this morning at the Bell Sensplex, Jason refused to talk to a small group of media members. Although it's not necessarily uncommon for a player to deny the media a request, it wasn't exactly a well thought out choice of action by Spezza. I realize that because it wasn't an official Senators workout, Spezza wasn't obligated to talk to the media. However, regardless of how you feel about them, the media are the lifeline between the player and the casual fan. For a polarizing player like Spezza, he can ill afford to be portrayed as a malcontent and have the common fan root against him.

Spezza's silence didn't go unnoticed either. Here are just a few blurbs from the Twittersphere...

Dan Séguin SeguinSports JasonSpezza refuses to talk to media after skate today. Sign of things to come?

Brent Wallace TSN_Wally Interesting Spezza wouldn't talk to the media today. I know he doesn't have to talk but still surprising. Hope not a sign of things to come

I'm hoping that things don't escalate from this or that too much is read into it but after the way that the Heatley situation unfolded, he should have known better. Common sense says that the media was just doing its job covering a practice. A couple of no comments and some manufactured hockey quote soundbytes would have sufficed.

I hope this isn't a sign of things to come...

2012 All-Star Game Awarded to Ottawa

Written by Nichols on .


According to the Globe & Mail's James Mirtle (via Twitter), the Ottawa Senators will be holding a press conference at 11 am on Wednesday. In what has long been speculated, NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman will be joining Eugene Melnyk to formally announce that the city of Ottawa will be the host for the 2012 All-Star Game.

Talk amongst yourselves...

Spezza Vs Yashin

Written by Nichols on .

yaspez

In a yet-to-be-released THN special feature, The Hockey News' staff is set to appease hockey fans who like lists by riddling off the names of the top 100 players of all-time, broken down by the top 20 players at each position. In conjunction with this list, a self-proclaimed panel of experts will also name the greatest starting lineup for all 30 NHL franchises. I bet fans of the Columbus Blue Jackets are giddy in anticipation.

While the feature seems like an easy way to sell some copies, THN did note that one of the more contentious discussions that they had was determining who Ottawa's greatest center of all-time is. The only problem is that instead of giving their online readers a glimpse into who they deemed was worthy of the title, they chose to leave us twisting in the wind in hopes that we'd actually invest in this special feature magazine when it becomes available for purchase. Fortunately for the readers of this website, I will to break it down for you for three reasons: one, you shouldn't have to wait to find out who's the better player; two, it's the THN, odds are they'll probably get it wrong; and three, it's free.

So without further ado.

Offensive Numbers:

Before being dealt to the New York Islanders at the 2001 NHL Entry Draft, Alexei Yashin totalled 218 goals and 491 points with the Senators. Good enough for the modern franchise lead that has since been broken by Daniel Alfredsson. With 218 goals and 491 points to his credit, his numbers are good for second on Ottawa's all-time list, eclipsing Spezza's 171 goals and 475 points. Although it should be noted, as The Hockey News astutely points out, that Spezza's points-per game average is higher than that of Yashin. Yet in all their mathematical glory, they were one-hundredth off as Spezza has actually averaged 1.03 points-per-game to Yashin's 0.97.

Yashin's worst statistical season in Ottawa was the 1995-96 season in which he missed the bulk of the season due to a contract holdout. Spezza's worst statistical came after he was accused by Jacques Martin of being a boy in a man's league. While Yashin and Spezza both share three 30-goal seasons, Yashin has two 40-goal campaigns to Spezza's none. From an assist perspective, Spezza not only surpasses Yash's totals -- 304 to 273 -- he shatters Yash's best mark for assists in one season by a whopping 21 helpers. So who's the better offensive player? Yash or Spezza?

When examining the numbers, The Hockey News believes that nothing is settled there.

Nothing is settled there? Talk about a cop out. The nothing is settled there answer is shallower than the John Muckler's pool of prospects who actually panned out. It's time to dig a little deeper here.

What about the quality of the teams that they played for?

When Yash first burst onto the scene, the Senators were terrible. They were coming off one of the worst NHL seasons in history and they had a first line that featured Bob Kudelski and Sly Turgeon. The team had dealt its enforcer (Mike Peluso) and their first string goalie (Peter Sidorkiewicz) who had experienced a traumatic neck injury in one of the team's final games. (Ed. note: When a team like New Jersey is willing to move pieces for a goaltender who was coming off a serious neck injury, it probably should raise red flags about the package coming back in return. Just saying...) Anyways, I digress. It took years of poor play and early draft picks before the organization could climb its way up the ladder to respectability. Yet, despite the amount of inferior talent surrounding him, Yashin still managed to put up some impressive numbers during the team's formative years.

Here's a look at the team's record during Yashin's tenure:
  • 1993-94: 14 wins, 61 losses, 9 ties, 37 pts
  • 1994-95: 9 wins, 34 losses, 5 ties, 23 pts
  • 1995-96: 18 wins, 59 losses, 5 ties, 41 pts
  • 1996-97: 31 wins, 36 losses, 15 ties, 77 pts (team clinches playoff spot for first time)
  • 1997-98: 34 wins, 33 losses, 15 ties, 83 pts
  • 1998-99: 44 wins, 23 losses, 15 ties, 103 pts
  • 2000-01: 48 wins, 21 losses, 9 ties, 109 pts
In comparison, here's a look at Ottawa's record when Spezza was on the team:
  • 2002-03: 52 wins, 21 losses, 8 ties, 1 OTL, 113 pts
  • 2003-04: 43 wins, 23 losses, 10 ties, 6 OTL, 102 pts
  • 2005-06: 52 wins, 21 losses, 9 ties, 113 pts
  • 2006-07: 48 wins, 25 losses, 9 ties, 105 pts (Stanley Cup finals appearance)
  • 2007-08: 43 wins, 31 losses, 8 OTL, 94 pts
  • 2008-09: 36 wins, 35 losses, 11 OTL, 83 pts
  • 2009-10: 44 wins, 32 losses, 6 OTL, 94 pts
When Jason joined the team, he was surrounded by a plethora of offensive talent. Names like Martin Havlat, Daniel Alfredsson and Marian Hossa were already helping carry the offensive workload for the Senators. As Spezza matured, his reponsibilities and quality of linemates improved significantly. Shawn McEachern may have been a defensively responsible, speedy up-and-down winger and Andreas Dackell might have been Swedish. But Dany Heatley and Daniel Alfredsson, they are not.

Also working against Yashin is the fact that he played in an era when the neutral zone trap became vogue. Thanks to the success of the New Jersey Devils, Jacques Lemaire's system was mimicked around the league. Of course it didn't help matters that the ineptitude of the NHL Officials Association refused to call the game as outlined by the NHL rule book. As the league made concerted efforts to try and fix the game, it was Spezza's generation of talent who reaped the benefits. Edge: Yashin

Defensive Play:

Maybe I should have entitled this defensive indifference since neither player is best known for playing a two-way game. Although to be fair, Yashin was never benched or singled out by Jacques Martin for being a defensive liability. It should be noted however that there has been a ground swell of support for Spezza's dedication to improving the defensive aspect of his game. It's for this reason that people keep drawing parallels between Spezza and Steve Yzerman's career paths. Edge: Even. Speaking of which...

The Steve Yzerman Coincidence:

In a piece that I wrote last November, I discussed the infamous Steve Yzerman to Ottawa trade that never happened.

According to legend, on February 26th, 1996, Detroit's VP and GM, Jimmy Devellano and Ottawa's GM, Pierre Gauthier agreed in principle to a trade that would have seen Chris Osgood and Steve Yzerman dealt to the Senators in exchange for Alexei Yashin, Damian Rhodes and Ottawa's first round picks in 1996 and 1997.

Over the years, there's been a lot of speculation as to why Devellano backed out on the trade. Some theorize that owner, Mike Illitch, vetoed the deal because Yzerman was one of his favorites. Another theory is that Devellano backed out because he only wanted to put a scare into Yzerman using the threat of a trade. At the time, it was well publicized that Head Coach Scotty Bowman was having issues getting Stevie Y to commit to the defensive side of the game. By publicly displaying the possibility that he could be moved, the threat of a trade left Yzerman quite impressionable. Imagine having to be faced with the daunting task of turning a his hometown team, a perennial losing franchise, into a contender.

However, the question remains...what if the Yzerman deal actually occurred?

On the surface, the Jason Spezza, Zdeno Chara and Bill Muckalt for Alexei Yashin fleacejob never happened. Without the 1996 and 1997 first rounders, Marian Hossa and Chris Phillips never would have played for the Senators either. No Hossa. No Heatley. No Milan Michalek. No Jonathan Cheechoo. (Huzzah!) And no 2010 second round pick.

In other words, without Chara and Phillips, the conversation concerning the best Senators defenceman ever would have been limited to Wade Redden, Norm MacIver and Steve Duchesne. Yikes. If that wasn't bad enough, imagine having to go through the rest of your existence as a Sens fan without being able to reference Bill Muckalt's goalless 2001-02 season?

Conversely, had Steve Yzerman been dealt to Ottawa, maybe he never would have made the team sacrifice and developed a solid two-way game. More importantly, without Jason Spezza, fans never would have heard their peers draw parallels between their respective careers.

So what's better? The man who was almost dealt for Steve Yzerman? Or the man who hasn't lived up to the expectations that he can follow in Stevie Y's footsteps? Edge: Yashin. (On the basis that I've read some rumours about returns in any Spezza trade, Ottawa isn't getting anything resembling an Yzerman in return.)

Playoff Performances:

Well, let's get this right out of the way. The true barometer of success in the eyes of many, is whether or not a player has a ring. Just ask Andre Roy. Unfortunately, although neither of our two comparables have won the Cup during their time here, for the purposes of this piece, there is a clear distinction in the playoff production between Spezza and Yashin. And it's this same distinction that The Hockey News chose to dissect and come to a conclusion that fits their purposes.

In the playoffs, Yashin had just 15 points in 26 games, while Spezza is much better at 46 points in 46 games. But here you have to look past the stats. Perception is the playoff reality in Ottawa and it’s the same for both players. The knock on Yashin was always his sudden disappearance come spring. But Spezza has also garnered a post-season reputation of disappearing for long periods of time like the team’s namesakes on Parliament Hill. Granted the Senators made the Cup final with Spezza in ’07, but in the eyes of media and fans he was nowhere to be found against Anaheim. And this past spring, Spezza put up a solid seven points in six games against Pittsburgh in the first round, yet was heavily criticized in Ottawa for what was seen as another vanishing act by a franchise center. Different stats, same perceived player.

So neither won a Cup and have (un)fairly been perceived as disappointments. I'm glad that's settled. It may not mean much but I think it says something when my distinct playoff memory for each individual is completely different. In Yashin's case, I'll never forget game of the Eastern Conference quarterfinals when the team was facing elimination against the Buffalo Sabres. With the Senators up by one goal, Yashin took a defensive zone faceoff that he won outright and lifted over the shoulder of a hapless Ron Tugnutt. Amazingly, Tugnutt one-upped himself in OT when a Derek Plante slapshot from just inside the blueline eluded his trapper.

With a struggling offensive club, Jacques Martin waited until the Senators were trailing three games to one in the 2003 Eastern Conference finals to New Jersey before inserting Jason Spezza into the lineup. Martin may have been a phenominal x's and o's kind of guy but it was this kind of move that cemented his legacy as a coach who was too stubborn to adapt to the situation. (Ed. note: Well, that and the fact that he never beat the Maple Leafs in four tries.) Anyways, the point here is that Spezza drew into the lineup and scored a

To be fair, neither player was blessed to have played in front of a capable goaltender during their times. (Ed. note: With the exception that had Dominik Hasek had elected not to go to Torino, I probably wouldn't even be discussing Jason Spezza's playoff disappointments. I blame Hasek, who had already won gold in Nagano and as unfair as it probably is, I blame John Muckler for not pushing the agenda. Even if he was bound not to.) Edge: Big edge to Spezza.

Ability to Stay On the Ice:

Withouth looking at the numbers, I bet that if you asked fans the question of who they thought had played more games in a Senators uniform - Yashin or Spezza? Most fans would respond with Spezza. Although both players have played here for seven years, when you take into account Yash's numerous contract holdouts and the 1994 NHL strike, it's easy to understand why some would make the assumption that Spezza had played in more games. Unlike Spezza who has battled a myriad of minor injuries, Yashin found a way to stay healthy. Four times he played the full 82-game season and in his rookie season, he played 83 of 84 games. However, I can't overlook the fact that Yashin missed so much time due to chase the almighty dollar. Edge: Spezza.

Distinctions:

When Spezza broke into the OHL scene at the age of 15, he immediately captured the attention of every hockey media outlet in this country. Always eager to find the next generational talent, they had no problem pegging Spezza as a future NHL phenom. I doubt that when they cued up the hype machine, they ever envisioned that one of Jason's best career moments to date would be his inclusion as part of Ben & Jerry's promotion of their Caramel Hat Trick ice-cream. Okay, so I'm not being entirely fair here. To his credit, Spezza has had some fine moments. During the NHL lockout in 2004, Spezza spent the year in the AHL capturing the league scoring title -- the John B. Sollenger Trophy -- and the Les Cunningham Trophy as the AHL's most valuable player. In 2007, his Senators went to the Stanley Cup final. A team feat that Yashin never did accomplish. Fittingly, Yashin's accomplishments were more of the personal variety. After missing the 1999-2000 season to a contract holdout, Yashin came to Ottawa to fulfill the last year of his contract and posted a 94 point season that earned him a nomination for the Hart Trophy as the league's most valuable player. Although Yashin didn't win the award, he was selected as a second team NHL All-Star. It wasn't the first time that Yashin was nominated for a major award though. As a rookie during the 1993-94 season, he posted 79 points and was nominated for the Calder Trophy. Do I even have to bother mentioning that Yashin was also the team captain before his last holdout lead to Alfie's succession of him? Talk about a blessing in disguise. Game. Set. Match. Edge: Yashin.

Public Perception:

On one hand, you have perhaps the most polarizing figure in Senators history. On the other, you have arguably the most hated Senators player ever. At least in Spezza's case, you can't accuse him of putting his own interests ahead of the team. Although he can come across as a vain player, most of the gripes against Spezza are levied against him because of this public perception that he has an abundance of untapped talent. Instead of accepting Spezza for what he is, many not only expect more from him, they demand more. They want him to develop that Steve Yzerman two-way game and see him impose his large frame upon the opposition more. It doesn't help matters that Spezza's been in the public eye from a very young age. Because of it, fans tend to overanalyze his postseason successes or lack thereof and question why he's never been a winner. Unlike Yashin, you can't accuse Spezza of being recluse. For starters, it's not like he chooses to live with his parents. From his very public wedding in the summer of 2009 to his charity work, Spezza has tried to embed himself into this city's fabric.

It's not like Yashin wasn't familiar with charity work though. It's just that when he did make donations, he had a tendency to take back his money. Despite this debacle, Yash will best be remembered for his two contract hold outs. Forever living in infamy for his self-serving greed. (Ed. note: From a personal standpoint, I always like Yashin. Having met and played street hockey with him, I can say that he was a really nice guy. Given his living situation and background, I've always believed that he was susceptible to some terrible advice from his agent, Mark Gandler.) Edge: Spezza

Conclusion:

Given the similarity in the number of games that Yashin (504) and Spezza (459) have played, the timing of the THN article is perfect. In either case, you can make a good argument as to why either player could be described as the greatest center who ever played for the organization. However, what ultimately doesn't work in Yashin's favour is that barring a trade, Jason Spezza's career with the Senators should be longer than Yashin's. (Ed. note: This is me knocking on wood right now.) Even if Spezza plays just one more season with the organization, he should easily pass Yashin for sole possession of second place on the franchise's points list. Besides, even if only twelve people attended the Save Spezza Rally, that's 12 more than Yashin ever received at the conclusion of the 2000-01 season. So in conclusion, like Yashin held onto the captaincy in Ottawa, he can wear the interim tag as the greatest center in Senators history until the more deserving player is ready to take it from him.

Senators Reveal 2010 Rookie Tournament Roster

Written by Nichols on .

cowen

In a press release that came out this morning, the Senators announced the names of the twenty-two players who will compete in this year's 2010 rookie tournament. The rookie camp begins with a practice on September 10th before the team takees a glamorous busride down the 401 to London where they will square off against prospects from the Chicago Blackhawks, Toronto Maple Leafs and Pittsburgh Penguins organizations.

On paper, it looks as though the Senators should have a strong team. Returnees from last year's squad include Robin Lehner, Craig Schira, Mike Hoffman, Jim O'Brien, Erik Condra, and Kaspars Daugavins. This core will be augmented by the likes of Jared Cowen (who was unable to play last year because of his ACL surgery), Eric Gryba, Patrick Wiercioch and Tim Spencer's fists.

The full roster and schedule can be read below:

Goaltenders: Brandon Foote (Guelph - OHL), Robin Lehner (Sault Ste. Marie - OHL, Binghamton - AHL)
Defencemen: Jared Cowen (Spokane - WHL, Ottawa - NHL), Eric Gryba (Boston University - Hockey East, Binghamton - AHL), Matthew Hobbs (Prince Edward Island - QMJHL), Craig Schira (Binghamton - AHL), Adam Sedlak (Peterborough - OHL), Patrick Wiercioch (Denver - WCHA)
Forwards: Jason Bailey (Binghamton - AHL), Bobby Butler (New Hampshire - Hockey East, Ottawa - NHL), Erik Condra (Binghamton - AHL), Corey Cowick (Ottawa - OHL), Jakub Culek (Rimouski - QMJHL), Kaspars Daugavins (Binghamton - AHL, Ottawa - NHL), David Dziurzynski (Alberni Valley - BCHL), Colin Greening (Cornell - ECAC), Mike Hoffman (Saint John - QMJHL), Jim O’Brien (Binghamton - AHL), Tim Spencer (Elmira - ECHL, Binghamton - AHL), Mark Stone (Brandon - WHL), Shawn Szydlowski (Erie - OHL), Adam Wallace (Windsor - OHL)
*Roster subject to change.

2010 rookie tournament schedule at London’s John Labatt Centre
Saturday, Sept. 11: Pittsburgh vs. Ottawa at 2 p.m.; Chicago vs. Toronto at 7 p.m.
Sunday, Sept. 12: Ottawa vs. Chicago at 2 p.m.; Toronto vs. Pittsburgh at 7 p.m.
Tuesday, Sept. 14: Chicago vs. Pittsburgh at 2 p.m.; Toronto vs. Ottawa at 7 p.m.

Here is my list of three things to look for:

1) The Blueline

Since the unheralded trio of Brian Lee, Matt Carkner and Chris Campoli is expected to inherit the fifth, sixth and seventh blueline spots respectively on the big club's roster, there's is some hope from fans that a bluechip prospect like Jared Cowen or Patrick Wiercioch can impress at the rookie tournament and carry whatever momentum they can into training camp. Unlike Wiercioch or an Eric Gryba who could get the call from Binghamton to fill in for an injured player, Jared Cowen still has junior eligibility and cannot be sent to the AHL to start the season. If Cowen can push a veteran for a spot in training camp, the real intrigue here lies in whether or not he can force management into a difficult decision: Will another year of junior will benefit Cowen's development?

2) Robin Lehner

A large amount of offseason focus has been devoted to the impending free agent statuses of a number of players next offseason. With both Brian Elliott (restricted) and Pascal Leclaire (unrestricted) due for new contracts, Lehner can ease the burden on Bryan Murray to resign both netminders if he makes a smooth transition to professional hockey.

3) Where Art Thou Jim O'Brien?

As a late first round pick in 2007 (29th overall), Jim O'Brien had a disappointing first season as he made the transition to pro. Although his confidence wasn't helped any as the coaching staff utilized him in a fourth line capacity centering Tim Spencer and Jeremy Yablonski, his play improved late in the season as he was given more responsibility. O'Brien needs to continue his development or he risks getting passed in the prospect depth chart.

Sens Possibly Getting The 2012 All-Star Game

Written by Nichols on .

Via Twitter, ESPN's EJ Hradek (@EJHradek_ESPN) sent this message to the Ottawa Sun's Bruce Garrioch (@SunGarrioch):

hradek
The Ottawa Citizen's Ken Warren had a little bit more insight on the matter:

League commissioner Gary Bettman has a scheduled meeting with Ottawa Senators brass next week at which point an announcement on the showcase game could be made. The 2010-11 all-star game has already been given to the Carolina Hurricanes.

If Ottawa is granted the game during Bettman’s luncheon with Senators owner Eugene Melnyk and general manager Bryan Murray, it won’t come as a complete surprise. The club has been on the short list to host the three-day event for several seasons, after Bettman promised Melnyk the NHL would accept Ottawa’s bid once the league’s previous commitments to other franchises had been fulfilled.

The one major roadblock which had stood in the Senators’ way — a shortage of convention space — should be cleared up next year. The new Ottawa Convention Centre, currently under construction, is scheduled to open next April.

The Senators submitted their plan to host the 2011-12 game last February and city council pledged $200,000 to help finance the bid.

Senators president Cyril Leeder also suggested in February that the Senators success with previous NHL events — a scaled down entry draft in 2005 following the lock out, and a full scale draft in 2008 — also put the Senators at the top of list for the all-star game.

With the amount of effort that the Senators organization has put in, it's almost like Ottawa's in the dreaded friend zone. The Senators have become that guy who tries too hard to land that girl who they've been coveting for years. Too eager to please and loyal to a fault, they've become an entity that the league will keep around because they know that they can be counted upon. But when push comes to shove, the Senators never get the date.

Seriously though, getting the All-Star Game would be a great festival for Ottawa to have. While I'm not a huge proponent of the game itself, there's no disputing the kind of positive economic impact that it would have on the city.

** Hat tip to HFboards.com for the find.

Is/Was Alexei Kovalev A Star?

Written by Nichols on .

A couple of days ago, I posted a piece detailing Alexei Kovalev and the criticisms of him by the fans and media alike. In the post entitled, A Post on Karma, I wrote a particular paragraph that helped spurn some discussion in the comment section:

Maybe at some point, the media in this town need to re-evaluate the term star. Kovalev's never been one. Case in point, the only DVD that he has been featured on is his own. Don't get me wrong. Five million dollars is a lot of money. But it's not star money. Name value doesn't equate itself to on-ice performance. As a player who has consistently demonstrated the ability to post approximately 60 points per season, his salary (or contract term for that matter) isn't that offensive and it's reflective of what secondary scorers can earn.With a little bit of research, people could finally understand that in four of the past five seasons, Kovalev's put up approximately 30 even strength points per season. Whenever there has been a flux in his point production, it's been because of the variations in his power play point totals. If we stop holding him to this fabricated standard that he's a star, we'll be better for it and can just appreciate him as the power play specialist that he is.

Rather than bury the discussion in an older thread, I thought it'd be beneficial to bring that article's comments to light in a new post to further the discussion. Anyways, I digress. The aforementioned paragraph helped provoke this response from commenter Steve HL:

I just wanted to argue your point of Kovalev never being a star. In his 20s and mid 20s he was very much a star-calibre player for the USSR/Russia and Rangers. He even played with an edge in the day. That isn't the case anymore, but we need to remember the early days of the athlete.

Fair enough. In regards to my comment on Kovalev not being a star, here's how I feel:  Although he's been very good at times, I feel that he's never been the biggest attraction on any team that he's played for. (With the exception of some very bad Montreal teams.) I just find that the term "star" is being thrown around too liberally and it's overused to describe good, but not great, players. When I think of star players, I think of the cream of the crop. Hall of Fame caliber players. When I think of "superstars", I think of generational talents like Lemieux, Gretzky, Ovechkin and Crosby. (Ed. note: Maybe you disagree, which is fine. This is just how I feel.)

Not to be outdone, Steve's opinion of Kovalev as a star player was shared by commenter Dr. K who posted two consecutive comments:

If anyone question his results by points then mention that he lead in points in Pitsburgh (he had quaility players to play with) Montreal 4 years straight in a defensive system. Lead NHL in 2008 in power play points. And look at the goals they are perfect goals. Appreciate greatness because he is a very special player. Support him well in Ottawa and look how he will respond. An artist with skills that are no match to anyone else.

and...

MVP in 2009 he owned Luango look at the ease and beauty of this wicked shot wicked.
If he is not a STAR player and talent why is it that he was named MVP? He said he was going to win it and he did. He can if he is well surround it. Any Star in this league has first line players. Who he played that we can say the same. Pitsburgh OK. Guess what he delivered Rangers? He was a key player for the cup in 1994.
Montreal? no first liners there. And guess what he still managed to lead this team in a defensive system. Just look at different angles you may have a an other perspective.

For the sake of discussion...

During his time in Pittsburgh, the only campaign in which Kovalev led the team in points was the tumultuous 2001/02 season. It should be noted that with the team facing financial ruin, the team could no longer afford to keep Jaromir Jagr, an impending free agent, and dealt him during that offseason to the Washington Capitals for picks and prospects. (Ed. note: If you ever want to determine who is/isn't a bandwagon Pens fan, just mention the names Kris Beech, Ross Lupaschuk and Michal Sivek. If they gasp in horror and go into the fetal position, you know what you're dealing with.) It also didn't help that Mario Lemieux spent the majority of the season on injured reserve recuperating from his hip injury.

As Dr. K. correctly asserts, Kovalev did lead the Montreal Canadiens in scoring. (Only on three occasions, not four.) Despite the quote defensive system that the Canadiens allegedly played when Kovalev lead the team in points, in terms of goals allowed, the Habs best finish was allowing the 12th least number of goals. Stymying!

I'm not disputing the fact that Kovalev is an all-world talent. Or that he's unbelievably skilled with his puck control . However, for the sake of numbers, let's look at a statistical comparison here. To keep in the same vein of a player who has lead some good defensive teams in scoring. If I told you that Kovalev's point-per-game production average of 0.806 (990 points in 1228 games played) was incredibly close to Jason Arnott's of 0.794 (873 in 1099 games), wouldn't you at least start to question Kovalev's production? (Ed. note: By comparison, Daniel Alfredsson's 992 points in 1002 games played is 0.99 PPG. If you also took Arnott's PPG average and carried that over Kovalev's 1228 games, he'd only have 15 less points than L'Enigma.) And like Kovalev, even Arnott has a Cup ring. (Ed. note: With New Jersey in 1999-00.)

To clarify matters, I never said Kovalev didn't have talent. He has tons of it. Like Mike Fisher, he's very toolsy. Unfortunately, like Fisher, he hasn't gotten the most out of his abilities. Being the MVP in a NHL All-Star Game should never be the criteria for being a star. Or anything else for that matter. In fact, any game in which Brad Marsh can score or in which checking and attention to defence is frowned upon, is exactly the kind of game that Kovalev should thrive in.

Thoughts?